I cringed when I saw the date of my last post in this blog, because I shouldn't let that much time pass between insightful, entertaining posts. But it is a vicious cycle, I'll be the first to admit. You see, I have these arguments with myself--well, discussions might be the better word--where on the one hand I tell myself that I shouldn't be wasting my time with my blog, because no one reads it. Then, on the other hand, I tell myself that more people would read it if I wrote more. These are not earth-shattering revelations here, but the ultimate point, I think, is that I need to decide what to do with this blog; it's a fish-or-cut-bait scenario.
But then it seems that every time I think about putting this blog out of its misery, something happens that forces me to once again sharpen my metaphorical crayon, like the kerfuffle over the Northampton Planning Board's requirement that the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish have a connection to the City's bike path in order to build its parish center. Now the Gazette is publishing letters from supporters on both sides of the issue. I've read these letters with great interest, particularly because I never thought that there could be people who would be against having a connection to the bike path. The Church maintains that its religious freedom is being infringed upon by the Planning Board. I find that argument a bit ironic, because one of the things I've always loved about riding a bike is the feeling of freedom that comes with it. Apparently there is some fear that older parishoners in particular will be subjected to hordes of cyclists riding through the parking lot of the church on Sundays when people are trying to find a parking space and get to mass. I never looked at it that way, and now that I have, I can honestly say that I still don't understand why it's a big deal to have a connection to the bike path. But if I figure out a good reason, I'll post it right here, because I'm back.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment